[Bug 4853] [Guidelines] Two Free Standing Statements

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4853


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-07-17 10:20 -------
[06:14] cferris: s/If grouping is utilized, choices between alternatives can be
indicated by an
 "exactly one" operator./If such grouping is utilized, choices between such
groupings can be indicated by an 
 "exactly one" operator./
[06:15] scribe: Asir: Chris suggestion is a correct statement
[06:15] paulc: Above change is Part 2.
[06:15] paulc: Part 1 is remove "and they now constitute a policy alternative.
"
[06:16] scribe: Paul: Asir and WG OK with part 1
[06:16] cferris: RESOLUTION: issue 4853 closed with above proposal
[06:16] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[06:16] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-ws-policy-irc#T10-18-43
[06:17] cferris: [06:14] cferris: sIf grouping is utilized, choices between
alternatives can be indicated by an
  "exactly one" operator./If such grouping is utilized, choices between such
groupings can be indicated by an 
  "exactly one" operator./
 [06:15] scribe: Asir: Chris suggestion is a correct statement
 [06:15] paulc: Above change is Part 2.
 [06:15] paulc: Part 1 is remove "and they now constitute a policy alternative.
"
[06:17] paulc: part 3: Section 4.1.2  is also changed.
RESOLUTION: issue 4853 closed with Part a) from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0017.html and
proposal in two parts above
See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-ws-policy-irc#T10-19-44

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:20:31 UTC