- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:15:55 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4945 Summary: Update References - Framework and Attachment Product: WS-Policy Version: PR Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Framework+Attachment AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: asirveda@microsoft.com QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org Title: Update References - Framework and Attachment Description: Related Actions Action-332 [1] - Editors to update references section prior to publication as Recommendations. Action-345 [2] - Asir to review references in the Framework and Attachment docs and create a WG issue on August 15th. We need to update the following references: Framework [3] a) RFC 2119 - uses incorrect date b) C14 1.0 WG Note - uses an old version of the WG Note c) SOAP 1.2 Part 1 - uses the first edition d) UDDI V3 - uses version 3.0.1 instead of 3.0.2 e) WS-Addressing Metadata - uses the Last Call draft instead of the Proposed Recommendation f) WSDL 20 - uses the Candidate Recommendation URI for the hyperlink Attachment [4] g) BP 1.1 - uses incorrect date h) RFC 2119 - uses incorrect date i) RFC 3023 - uses incorrect date j) WSDL 20 - uses the Candidate Recommendation URI for the hyperlink k) WS-Addressing Metadata - uses the Last Call draft instead of the Proposed Recommendation l) WS-RM Policy - uses the April 2006 version instead of the OASIS Standard version dated June 14th 2007. This means, the examples 2-1, 3-1 and 4-1 and the WS-RM Policy assertion namespace name in the XML Namespaces table are out of date m) XPointer Framework – uses incorrect date. Justification: Need to clean up and update the References in the Framework and Attachment drafts. Proposal: There are two parts: A) Attached HTML docs outline proposals to resolve the issue B) We need to create ticker editorial actions for Felix to sync up the Framework and Attachment drafts with the WS-A Metadata Recommendation (may be this one is business as usual). [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/332 [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/345 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-ws-policy-20070706/#References [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-ws-policy-attach-20070706/#References
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2007 01:16:02 UTC