[Bug 4393] [Primer] Add text to strict and lax policy intersection discussion describing how a policy consumer can determine issues due to intersection mode conflicts

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4393





------- Comment #2 from monica.martin@sun.com  2007-04-25 16:17 -------
Updated minor changes to answer Glen Daniel's question from 18 April 2007
conference call, see resolution:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Apr/0055.html

   [change from / Glen's] "Regardless of the chosen intersection mode,
   ignorable assertions do not express any concrete requirements on the
   behavior of consumers - in other words, a consumer is free to ignore
   (hence the name "ignorable") any such assertions that end up in the
   resulting policy after interesection, with no adverse effects on
   runtime interactions."

   [change to / updated] "Regardless of the chosen intersection mode,
   ignorable assertions do not express any wire-level requirements on
   the behavior of consumers - in other words, a consumer could choose
   to ignore any such assertions that end up in the resulting policy
   after interesection, with no adverse effects on runtime interactions."

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 16:18:26 UTC