- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:53:40 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619 ------- Comment #2 from mhondo@us.ibm.com 2006-09-06 15:53 ------- >From Paul Cotton- Add an issue on coordination with other working groups http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619 Maryann carried out her action to ask the WS-Addressing WG to review the example in Section 3.4 of WS-PolicyAttachments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0087.html We need to consider the questions asked by Marc Hadley in his response to Maryann's request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0089.html "Have you considered the semantics when other things are included in the EndpointReference. In particular, if the EPR contains a metadata element with an embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL), how are the policies reconciled?"
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:54:12 UTC