W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from August 2006
by thread
44 messages
:
Starting
Thursday, 31 August 2006 06:48:00 UTC,
Ending
Thursday, 31 August 2006 14:42:09 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
[Bug 3639] Which policy alternative was selected?
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3638] Need to be able to specify ordering between assertions
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3623] Relation of Attachment to SAWSDL
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3622] Policy assertion equivalence and generality
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3621] Formal semantics
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3620] Policy Attachment to WS-Addr EndpointReferences
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3619] add an inssue on coordination with other working groups
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3617] Namespace URI versioning Policy is not clear
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3613] Clarify conversion of compact to normal form in Framework section 4.3
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3616] Policy Negotiation
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3607] Better describe policy language capabilities in the Introduction
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3605] Typo wsp:tPolicyURIs in Section 3.3 first example
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3604] Goals section inadequate or unnecessary
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3602] The absence of an assertion should not mean that the behavior is "explicitly prohibited"
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3599] Need a URI structure to refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc.
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3592] Implementation APIs for WS-Policy should not simply wrap DOM elements
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3590] Policy framework should document extensibility points using {any} and @{any} in xpath-like expressions, and define these in Notational Conventions section
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3586] Remove misleading reference to a Requester policy.
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3577] Semantics of successful intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3566] Remove misleading phrasing of section 1.1 Goals section
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3565] Framework and domain specific policy assertions
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3564] Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3563] Modify wording about a Web Service in the Introduction
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3562] Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3561] Usage of Internationalized Resource Identifiers for W3C WS-Policy
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3560] The framework specification should also enable the usage of xml:id
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3559] Conformance Sections needed for both specs
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3558] Remove example of use of domain expressions in section 4.2
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3556] Suggested rewording of Introduction to WS-PolicyAttachment
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3554] "Policy Alternatives" and "Policy" need proper definition
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3553] Policy Compatibility Check must account for level of Nesting of Policy Alternatives
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3552] Policy Application to Web services Model description inaccurate
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3551] Misc. (editorial) corrections throughout
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3549] Require assertions to be distinguished from parameter elements
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3548] Normalization should make empty nested policy elements
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3547] Clarify the difference between Web Services Policy and Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework in the Introduction
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3546] WSDL 2.0 status recorded in Attachments 1.5 document
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3545] use of {any} and {@any} in xpath-like expressions not defined in Notational Conventions section
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3544] should ws-policy-attach permit use of BP1.1 amended extensibility points?
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3543] Definion of the term "processor" is poorly defined
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3535] specify a W3C namespace URI
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
[Bug 3557] Add discussion/examples of domain expressions
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
Your Bugzilla password.
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
(Thursday, 31 August)
New Public mailing list - public-ws-policy-qa
Fumihiro Kato
(Thursday, 31 August)
Last message date
: Thursday, 31 August 2006 14:42:09 UTC