- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:24:13 -0700
- To: "sychang@bea.com" <sychang@bea.com>, "dug@us.ibm.com" <dug@us.ibm.com>, "sjones@layer7tech.com" <sjones@layer7tech.com>, "Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM" <Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM>, "jonathan@wso2.com" <jonathan@wso2.com>, "sanka@wso2.com" <sanka@wso2.com>, "prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com" <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, "ramana.turlapati@oracle.com" <ramana.turlapati@oracle.com>
- CC: "public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
Now that we have one set of results for the Media Type test case can we get other companies to provide their results? This is a very simple test case. You only need to create web resource and mark it with the correct media type and then a client do a HTTP Get on it. Can interop participants let me know who plans to provide additional interop evidence for the Media type test case? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy- > interop-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki > Sent: April 4, 2007 12:31 PM > To: Daniel Roth > Cc: sychang@bea.com; dug@us.ibm.com; sjones@layer7tech.com; > Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM; jonathan@wso2.com; sanka@wso2.com; > prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com; ramana.turlapati@oracle.com; public-ws- > policy-interop@w3.org; Asir Vedamuthu > Subject: Re: Microsoft implementation for the Round 4 WS-Policy Media Type > Test Case is now available > > > I updated the results. > > Regards, Felix > > Daniel Roth wrote: > > > > Attached document contains Microsoft Round 2 WSDL 11 test results. > > While running these tests we discovered a few issues with the interop > > WSDL 1.1 files that are orthogonal to Round 2 WSDL 11 testing: > > > > a) "SimpleFault" element declaration is missing in the in-lined XML > > Schema. We suggest adding the element declaration. > > > > b) wsdlsoap:body elements are used within the wsdl:binding/wsdl:fault > > elements. wsdlsoap:fault should be used instead [1]. We suggest > > replacing such occurrences of wsdlsoap:body elements with > > wsdlsoap:fault elements. > > > > c) WSDL document contains a residual element - 'UsingPolicy' - from an > > old version of the WS-Policy. We suggest removing these elements. > > > > Attached are the updated WSDL documents with these suggested fixes. > > > > Daniel Roth > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <results xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > > xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../results.xsd"> > > <participantref>Microsoft</participantref> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T1</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T2</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T3</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T4</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T5</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T6</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T7</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T8</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T9</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T10</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T11</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > <result> > > <testcaseref>R2WSDL11T12</testcaseref> > > <passed>true</passed> > > </result> > > </results> > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 16:40:27 UTC