- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:19:26 -0700
- To: "WS-Policy Editors W3C" <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <497B3BF095D687408EC268A103E85E857FFD93@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
Folks, I was trying to make my editorial changes from the F2F to the WS-Policy Framework document and I just realized, the HTML WS-Policy Framework document generated gets truncated in the middle of section 2.4 (Terminology). I have reproduced below the entire section 2.4 as generated. I am unable to proceed with my AIs until this is fixed. I am checking what went wrong but, if anyone else has any ideas please let me know. Regards, Prasad 2.4 Terminology The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [IETF RFC 2119 <file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo rk.html#RFC2119#RFC2119> ]. We introduce the following terms that are used throughout this document: ignorable policy assertion <file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo rk.html#ignorable_policy_assertion#ignorable_policy_assertion> An ignorable policy assertion is an assertion that may be ignored for policy intersection (as defined in 4.5 Policy Intersection <http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-policy#Policy_Intersection> ). nested policy expression <file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo rk.html#nested_policy_expression#nested_policy_expression> A nested policy expression is a <a title="
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:19:34 UTC