RE: Action-239 and Issue 4393 (was RE: WS-Policy - Editors' Timeline

Asir,
You should take another look. The 4th paragraph from the changes "When using ..." is in fact there. What's not there is the last paragraph since it wasn't highlighted with <<>>. I assumed they were using an older version of the document. If that's not the case, I can easily add it (10 seconds).  --  Toufic
 
Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer

(o)  604.681.9377 x310
(m) 604.288.7970
 <http://www.layer7tech.com/assets/images/20061005/layer7_logo.png> 
Secure, Simplify, Scale your Web Services.

________________________________

From: Asir Vedamuthu [mailto:asirveda@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 4:44 PM
To: Toufic Boubez
Cc: David Orchard; Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: Action-239 and Issue 4393 (was RE: WS-Policy - Editors' Timeline



It appears that all of the changes from the 4393 resolution [1] did not make it into the Primer.

 

For instance, the fourth paragraph - "When using the strict intersection mode, all assertions are part of the policy alternative vocabulary, including those marked with wsp:Ignorable. Thus, the wsp:Ignorable attribute does not impact the intersection result even when its attribute value is "true" - and the last paragraph in Charlton's summary e-mail [1] didn't make into the Primer.

 

May I request you to double check?

 

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Apr/0057.html 

 

Regards,

 

Asir S Vedamuthu

Microsoft Corporation

 

 

From: Toufic Boubez [mailto:tboubez@layer7tech.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:39 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; David Orchard; Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: WS-Policy - Editors' Timeline

 

Action 239 was completed a couple of days ago.  --  Toufic

 

Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
Chief Technology Officer

(o)  604.681.9377 x310

(m) 604.288.7970


Secure, Simplify, Scale your Web Services.

 

________________________________

From: Asir Vedamuthu [mailto:asirveda@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 12:31 PM
To: David Orchard; Prasad Yendluri; Toufic Boubez
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: WS-Policy - Editors' Timeline

>April 30th - actions 239 240 and 244 are due

 

Action 244 [1] is marked as CLOSED. I found a check-in for action-239 [2]. May I request you to confirm that actions 239 (Toufic) and 240 (David O) were completed?

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/244

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2007Apr/0104.html  

 

Regards,

 

Asir S Vedamuthu

Microsoft Corporation

 

 

 

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:53 PM
To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: WS-Policy - Editors' Timeline

 

This e-mail is a high level summary of what we all discussed yesterday. Please let me know if I missed anything.

 

a)  April 30th - actions 239 240 and 244 are due

b)  May 1st - deliver updated Scenarios archive and Primer document to the WG

c)  May 2nd - actions 227-234 are due

d)  May 9th - actions 249-256 are due

e)  May 9th - launch Guidelines document editorial review

f)  May 16th - editorial review completed, edits applied and Guidelines clean and diff copies generated

g)  May 17th - deliver updated Guidelines document to the WG

 

Regards,

 

Asir S Vedamuthu

Microsoft Corporation