RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers

So this works for "stock" xmlpsec?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:39 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers
> 
> 
> David Orchard wrote:
> > Yes..
> > 
> > The problem is that we have to use the WSDL 2.0 xmlspec 
> because it has 
> > support for <emph> inside <code>, which is in the table of 
> identifiers.
> > The WG wanted the table to look like the WSDL 2.0 table.
> 
> I solved the problem, but did not commit yet. I used markup like this:
> <td><code>wsdl11.types(</code><code
> role="code-emph">types</code><code>)</code></td>
> and munged the xslt to produce HTML like this:
> <code style="font-style: italic;">types</code> You can see 
> the look at 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/01/wsdl11-elementidentifier
> / (not finished for publication yet, only member-visible.)
> 
> Felix
> 
> Regards, Felix.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Dave
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:15 AM
> >> To: David Orchard
> >> Subject: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers
> >>
> >> David,
> >>
> >> a long time ago, you mentioned troubles with xmlspec and 
> the WSDL 1.1 
> >> element identifiers. I promised to look into that and 
> never did. Do 
> >> you still have them?
> >>
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:46:32 UTC