- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:13:55 -0500
- To: "ext Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, ext Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, WS-Policy Editors W3C <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
I do not understand why we cannot show progress to date to the TC unless there is a serious issue. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 8, 2007, at 11:51 AM, ext Asir Vedamuthu wrote: >> If we agree on doing this then I will make the >> changes and this can >> be included in the red-line Asir generates. > > This is not the current practice. Can't think of a reason why this > proposal needs to be rushed in. BTW, this is the second time we are > discussing this process question (we discussed a similar process > question in the last week of Nov 06). > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > Microsoft Corporation > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick > Hirsch > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:51 PM > To: ext Prasad Yendluri > Cc: Frederick Hirsch; WS-Policy Editors W3C > Subject: Re: 1st draft on primer ignorable > > > Prasad > > Thanks for the helpful review, I agree with all your changes and > suggest we remove the line > " Providers should not lie and the Ignorable marker allows them to be > truthful." > > I propose we include these changes in the red-line set of documents > we provide the committee. This lets the committee see it (as a > DRAFT) at the F2F and possibly provide constructive feedback. > > I understand there was an issue raised by Ashok but believe there was > strong committee agreement to keep ignorable as we agreed. Thus it > would make sense to have this text in place. I can remove it if we > have to. > > If we agree on doing this then I will make the changes and this can > be included in the red-line Asir generates. > > Please let me know so I can do this in a timely manner. Asir, does > this make sense to you? > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:49 PM, ext Prasad Yendluri wrote: > >> Hi Frederick, >> >> Thanks for doing this. Looks pretty complete to me. >> I have attached a marked up copy with a few of my comments / >> suggested >> changes. >> >> Thanks. >> Prasad >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick >> Hirsch >> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:56 AM >> To: WS-Policy Editors W3C >> Cc: Hirsch Frederick >> Subject: 1st draft on primer ignorable >> >> Attached is 1st draft on adding ignorable to primer. I think we can >> do this simply by adding two new sections as noted. >> >> Please let me know if you think I should add it in today to get it >> into the draft for the F2F, or if you have any other suggestion or >> comment. >> >> Thanks >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> <ignorable-proposal-PY.doc> > >
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 17:14:28 UTC