Re: 1st draft on primer ignorable


Thanks for the helpful review, I agree with all your changes and  
suggest we remove the line
" Providers should not lie and the Ignorable marker allows them to be  

I propose we include these changes in the red-line set of documents  
we provide the committee. This lets the  committee see it (as a  
DRAFT) at the F2F and possibly provide constructive feedback.

I understand there was an issue raised by Ashok but believe there was  
strong committee agreement to keep ignorable as we agreed. Thus it  
would make sense to have this text in place. I can remove it if we  
have to.

If we agree on doing this then I will make the changes and this can  
be included in the red-line Asir generates.

Please let me know so I can do this in a timely manner. Asir, does  
this make sense to you?


regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:49 PM, ext Prasad Yendluri wrote:

> Hi Frederick,
> Thanks for doing this. Looks pretty complete to me.
> I have attached a marked up copy with a few of my comments / suggested
> changes.
> Thanks.
> Prasad
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [] On Behalf Of Frederick  
> Hirsch
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:56 AM
> To: WS-Policy Editors W3C
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick
> Subject: 1st draft on primer ignorable
> Attached is 1st draft on adding ignorable to primer. I think we can
> do this simply by adding two new sections as noted.
> Please let me know if you think I should add it in today to get it
> into the draft for the F2F, or if you have any other suggestion or
> comment.
> Thanks
> regards, Frederick
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> <ignorable-proposal-PY.doc>

Received on Saturday, 6 January 2007 01:55:48 UTC