- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:50:45 -0500
- To: ext Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, WS-Policy Editors W3C <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
Prasad Thanks for the helpful review, I agree with all your changes and suggest we remove the line " Providers should not lie and the Ignorable marker allows them to be truthful." I propose we include these changes in the red-line set of documents we provide the committee. This lets the committee see it (as a DRAFT) at the F2F and possibly provide constructive feedback. I understand there was an issue raised by Ashok but believe there was strong committee agreement to keep ignorable as we agreed. Thus it would make sense to have this text in place. I can remove it if we have to. If we agree on doing this then I will make the changes and this can be included in the red-line Asir generates. Please let me know so I can do this in a timely manner. Asir, does this make sense to you? Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:49 PM, ext Prasad Yendluri wrote: > Hi Frederick, > > Thanks for doing this. Looks pretty complete to me. > I have attached a marked up copy with a few of my comments / suggested > changes. > > Thanks. > Prasad > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick > Hirsch > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:56 AM > To: WS-Policy Editors W3C > Cc: Hirsch Frederick > Subject: 1st draft on primer ignorable > > Attached is 1st draft on adding ignorable to primer. I think we can > do this simply by adding two new sections as noted. > > Please let me know if you think I should add it in today to get it > into the draft for the F2F, or if you have any other suggestion or > comment. > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > <ignorable-proposal-PY.doc>
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2007 01:55:48 UTC