RE: Action-12 - Potential RFC 2119 Terms

Thank you for reviewing this draft. Yes, I found only one in each of
these docs. I'll post it to the WG this evening (earlier than planned).

Regards,
 
Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:37 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: RE: Action-12 - Potential RFC 2119 Terms

I am surprised we missed only one of these in each of the specs (are
good or
what?), but looks good to go to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:28 PM
To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: Action-12 - Potential RFC 2119 Terms

Please review the draft e-mail (and marked up HTML docs) to the WG. I
plan to post this to the WG tomorrow at 7 AM Pacific.

---- draft e-mail ----

Editors Action-12 is entitled 'Review the docs focusing on potential RFC
2119 terms and report to the WG what needs to be capitalized' [1].

Proposed Resolution

The attached HTML docs highlight potential RFC 2119 terms in the
framework and attachment drafts. If we have missed any terms please let
us know.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/12 

Regards,
 
Asir S Vedamuthu
On behalf of the editorial team

Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 23:44:04 UTC