- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:43:12 -0800
- To: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
Thank you for reviewing this draft. Yes, I found only one in each of these docs. I'll post it to the WG this evening (earlier than planned). Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:37 PM To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: RE: Action-12 - Potential RFC 2119 Terms I am surprised we missed only one of these in each of the specs (are good or what?), but looks good to go to me. -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:28 PM To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: Action-12 - Potential RFC 2119 Terms Please review the draft e-mail (and marked up HTML docs) to the WG. I plan to post this to the WG tomorrow at 7 AM Pacific. ---- draft e-mail ---- Editors Action-12 is entitled 'Review the docs focusing on potential RFC 2119 terms and report to the WG what needs to be capitalized' [1]. Proposed Resolution The attached HTML docs highlight potential RFC 2119 terms in the framework and attachment drafts. If we have missed any terms please let us know. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/12 Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu On behalf of the editorial team
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 23:44:04 UTC