- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:14:08 +0900
- To: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Prasad Yendluri wrote: > > Felix, > > > > I updated the entire directory again but, unfortunately it does not seem to > > have fixed the problem. Same problem as before with the generated diffs. sorry, I had fixed the "request on the web problem" and had missed that one. Now it should be fine. Could you have another look? Felix > > > > Thanks. > > > > Prasad > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki > > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:04 AM > > To: Prasad Yendluri > > Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Diffs generated from build.xml diff target do not look right > > > > > > Hi Prasad, > > > > This should work now again. The problem was that the DIFF tool did not > > work correctly if the previous WDs were fetched from the WEB. So I > > installed local copies of them, i.e. > > ws-policy-framework-tr20060927.xml > > ws-policy-attachment-tr20060927.xml > > Could you update the directory and see if everything works now? > > > > > > Prasad Yendluri wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I just tried to generate the diff files using the ant build with "diff" >> >> target. It seems the generated diff files do not look right. >> >> >> >> I have attached the framework-diff.html file >> >> (ws-policy-framework-diff20060927.html). You would noticed that right at >> >> the top, the in red highlight it shows a lot deleted material (including >> >> editors list), that have not been deleted in actuality. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I contrasted with the previous round's diff generated (see >> >> > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework-diff2 > > 0060731.html), >> >> that seems fine. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do we have an issue with diff generation? I simply invoked the diff >> >> target via ant on build.xml. >> >> >> >> BTW, why the 20060927 date? > > > > this is the date of the previous publication at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-20060927 . That publication is > > identical to the approved WDs tagged as > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/ws/policy/?only_with_tag=Approved-as-Second-Pu > > blic-Working-Draft > > . > > > > Felix
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:14:19 UTC