- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:10:19 -0400
- To: fsasaki@w3.org
- Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org, dorchard@bea.com
- Message-ID: <A3E375FA108EF94496269A5A96AFCAC106E93F6F@mailwest-e0b>
Felix, I am working on updating the "Substantive Changes since last working draft" in the framework document (and Dave O is doing the same for the attachment document), as we discussed on the editors call today. We want to reflect the changes since the last published drafts that were approved at the Bellevue F2F. The WS-Policy WG main Page at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/ <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/> has links to the July version of the published docs public_draftsPublished W3C Working Drafts * Web Services Policy <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-20060731> 1.5 - Framework * Web Services <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20060731> Policy 1.5 - Attachment I hope I am not mistaken but, should these now be changed to point to the Sept f2f approved versions? I want to be sure that we are highlighting the changes from the correct dated revision of the specs. In CVS I see that http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html? rev=1.31 <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html ?rev=1.31> and http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.html ?rev=1.41 <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.htm l?rev=1.41> had been tagged to be approved versions. We will move forward with capturing the significant changes since the above two revisions for fwk and attach docs respectively but, if that was not the correct assumption, please let us know. If those are the correct revisions, can you please update the main page to point to those versions so that, when we send the new Ed-drafts for approval, there would not be a confusion with respect to diffs generated etc. Thanks. Prasad
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 21:10:39 UTC