- From: Umit Yalsinap via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:40:28 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2006/ws/policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv28184 Modified Files: ws-policy-guidelines.xml Log Message: Fixed a reference Index: ws-policy-guidelines.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.xml,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10 --- ws-policy-guidelines.xml 1 Nov 2006 02:31:56 -0000 1.9 +++ ws-policy-guidelines.xml 1 Nov 2006 02:40:25 -0000 1.10 @@ -831,10 +831,10 @@ semantics if the incoming messages also utilized the behavior. This is especially important if the assertion is applicable to more than one specific policy subject. One - approach that is currently taken by WS-RM Policy <bibref - ref="WS-RM"/> is to introduce both message and endpoint + approach that is currently taken by WS-RM Policy [<bibref + ref="WS-RM-Policy"/>] is to introduce both message and endpoint policy subjects for one of its assertions and require the - use of endpoint policy subject when message level subject + use of endpoint policy subject when message policy subject is used via attachment. </p> </item> </ulist> </item>
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 02:46:03 UTC