- From: Umit Yalsinap via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:40:28 +0000
- To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2006/ws/policy
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv28184
Modified Files:
ws-policy-guidelines.xml
Log Message:
Fixed a reference
Index: ws-policy-guidelines.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -d -r1.9 -r1.10
--- ws-policy-guidelines.xml 1 Nov 2006 02:31:56 -0000 1.9
+++ ws-policy-guidelines.xml 1 Nov 2006 02:40:25 -0000 1.10
@@ -831,10 +831,10 @@
semantics if the incoming messages also utilized the
behavior. This is especially important if the assertion is
applicable to more than one specific policy subject. One
- approach that is currently taken by WS-RM Policy <bibref
- ref="WS-RM"/> is to introduce both message and endpoint
+ approach that is currently taken by WS-RM Policy [<bibref
+ ref="WS-RM-Policy"/>] is to introduce both message and endpoint
policy subjects for one of its assertions and require the
- use of endpoint policy subject when message level subject
+ use of endpoint policy subject when message policy subject
is used via attachment. </p> </item>
</ulist> </item>
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 02:46:03 UTC