- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:38:36 -0700
- To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
- Message-ID: <A3E375FA108EF94496269A5A96AFCAC10672BFBD@mailwest-e0b>
This sounds good to me. I can do the Editorial team report for the next WG call (8/23/06) I think Oral is better as we can give the most current status as of the meeting time (and one less write up to deal with ;). The chair of the previous editors' call would be the point person for the editorial team report but, anyone on the editor's team should be able to supplement as needed though. Regards, Prasad _____ From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 10:54 AM To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org Subject: WS-Policy Editorial Team Report For the WG conference calls, there is a standing agenda item labeled 'Editorial Team Report'. Just as chairing and scribing the editors' conference call, I suggest that we give this oral or written report on a rotation basis. The prior week editors' conference call chair is a good candidate to give this report in the next WG conference call. (This means, Prasad, it is your turn to give this report on Wednesday Aug 23rd.) Also, we should consider providing the co-chairs advance notice on who will give this report. This will help the co-chairs to call the right person on the conference call. What do you think? Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 20:39:59 UTC