RE: PFTF next telcon

Midnight isn't silly :-)  Though 1:30 am is getting about half an hour too
late :-)

What would be a reasonable rotation?  How many slots?

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sanjiva
> Weerawarana
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:09 AM
> To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
>
>
>
> Not as well for me .. that's midnight. Silly time depends on where
> you are Dave ;-).
>
> Anyway, in order to find a slot I am happy to accept 1pm eastern
> for an hour. However, I suggest that we consider rotating the times
> to distribute the inconvenience. This is standard practice in IBM
> where we have regular calls with folks in Japan, China, Europe,
> US and everywhere in between.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
> To: <public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:55 PM
> Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
>
>
> >
> >
> > 1PM EST works for me.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:34 AM
> > > To: Sandeep Kumar
> > > Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; gdaniels@macromedia.com;
> > > youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
> > > "Sandeep Kumar" <sandkuma@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am
> > > PST suitable to
> > > > everyone?
> > > > That is right after WSD meeting.
> > >
> > > It would be *really* nice to have some sort of break between
> > > meetings.  Half an hour would be enough, but it would really
> > > help to be able to stand up and walk around a bit.  So I'm
> > > not thrilled by 9:30 (12:30 EST); would prefer 10:00 (1:00
> > > EST), half an hour after the end of the WSD meeting.
> > >
> > > Amy!
> > > > - sandeep
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > > > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> > > Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> > > > To: Glen Daniels
> > > > Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > > > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> > > > West Costers.
> > > >
> > > > Jean-Jacques.
> > > >
> > > > Glen Daniels wrote:
> > > > > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> > > > >
> > > > > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be
> doing work on the
> > > > scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> > > > >
> > > > > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can
> > > share syntactic
> > > > examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon
> > > feature, uri
> > > > equals quote..." :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Amelia A. Lewis
> > > Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> > > alewis@tibco.com
> > >
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 12:31:06 UTC