RE: PFTF next telcon

1PM EST works for me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:34 AM
> To: Sandeep Kumar
> Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; gdaniels@macromedia.com;
> youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> 
> 
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
> "Sandeep Kumar" <sandkuma@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am 
> PST suitable to
> > everyone?
> > That is right after WSD meeting.
> 
> It would be *really* nice to have some sort of break between 
> meetings.  Half an hour would be enough, but it would really 
> help to be able to stand up and walk around a bit.  So I'm 
> not thrilled by 9:30 (12:30 EST); would prefer 10:00 (1:00 
> EST), half an hour after the end of the WSD meeting.
> 
> Amy!
> > - sandeep
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of 
> Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> > To: Glen Daniels
> > Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> > West Costers.
> > 
> > Jean-Jacques.
> > 
> > Glen Daniels wrote:
> > > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> > >
> > > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing work on the
> > scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> > >
> > > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can 
> share syntactic
> > examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon 
> feature, uri
> > equals quote..." :)
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:55:57 UTC