Re: Attributes in WSDL

+1, well said.  My only comment is that your point (c) isn't strictly true,
as you could always just attach such metadata to the operations or even the
schema.  But I completely agree with your conclusion.  I think that the
service state and management space is a very interesting one, and there are
some simple and powerful things that can be done there, things which seem
like perfect candidates for WSDL extensions.

--Glen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Graham" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
To: <public-ws-desc-state@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: Attributes in WSDL


>
>
>
>
>
> All:
> I do not agree with the direction we are taking with attributes in WSDL
2.0
> working group. My reasons include:
>
> a) Forcing the designer to use Get/Set operation pairs to denote
attributes
> results in a model of very fine grained access.
> b) The approach is quite complicated, this reduces the
> functionality/capability of tools to support this approach ubiquitously.
> c) The approach does not allow/support addition of policy/meta-data
> specifically associated with the attributes.
>
> Therefore I request that the WSDL WG reconsider its position on attributes
> and terminate this line of activity. The concept of attributes in Web
> services should be done in another venue that would allow a simpler and
> more complete treatment of this concept.
>
> sgg
> ++++++++
> Steve Graham
> (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> STSM, On Demand Architecture
> Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> ++++++++
>
>

Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 17:39:51 UTC