- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:02:13 +0100
- To: <public-ws-desc-state@w3.org>
Roberto,
Thank you for sending this. Please, see a comment bellow.
[snip]
> <ws:operation
> name="get_XXX"
> style="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/style/get-attribute"
> pattern="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/in-out">
> <ws:input name="in" body="wrappers:get_XXX"/>
> <ws:output name="out" body="wrappers:get_XXXResponse"/>
> </ws:operation>
>
> <ws:operation
> name="set_XXX"
> style="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/style/set-attribute"
> pattern="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/in-out">
> <ws:input name="in" body="wrappers:set_XXX"/>
> <ws:output name="out" body="wrappers:set_XXX"/>
> </ws:operation>
>
What is the difference between the two operations above and the ones
bellow?
<ws:operation name="get_XXX"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/in-out">
<ws:input name="in" body="wrappers:get_XXX"/>
<ws:output name="out" body="wrappers:get_XXXResponse"/>
</ws:operation>
<ws:operation name="set_XXX"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/in-out">
<ws:input name="in" body="wrappers:set_XXX"/>
<ws:output name="out" body="wrappers:set_XXX"/>
</ws:operation>
In other words, what would the accompanying language be for the specific
@style URI? What does such a URI suggest? Is it the case that a
<blabla>/{get|set}-attribute URI is going to be just a hint to tooling?
I still don't see the need for this but I guess an optional @style URI,
with no suggested semantics for a Web Service, is a reasonable
compromise.
Regards,
.savas.
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:05:21 UTC