- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:55:04 -0500
- To: public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org
I've been working on illustrating the correspondence between our Input/Output Patterns (IOPs) and Message Exchange Patterns (MEPs). I've listed all of the 7 IOPs that we discussed, and converted them into various kinds of MEPs. (Our previously discussed pattern #8, Request/Response, is an MEP already, so it didn't need to be converted. It is MEP #2b.) The document is at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs-iops_clean.htm and it contains the following sections (some empty): Introduction Patterns - IOPs and MEP Use Cases that Illustrate Differences Between IOPs and MEPs Advantages of IOPs Over MEPs Advantages of MEPs Over IOPs The "Use Cases" section needs details and additional use cases. (They don't have to have fancy diagrams either. Text is fine.) It is not intended to enumerate all use cases that are relevant to WSDL. It is only intended to list a few use cases that may be helpful in understanding the difference between having the WSDL interface/portType model IOPs versus MEPs. The "Advantages" sections are the main ones that I am hoping that this TF can fill produce. Ideally I would like to nail down all the pros and cons that we see of both ways of doing things, and then bring it to the WG as a whole to make a decision. Also, I'm not sure I got pattern 7 right. (Amy, would you take a look?) -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 22:55:26 UTC