- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:55:04 -0500
- To: public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org
I've been working on illustrating the correspondence between our
Input/Output Patterns (IOPs) and Message Exchange Patterns (MEPs). I've
listed all of the 7 IOPs that we discussed, and converted them into various
kinds of MEPs. (Our previously discussed pattern #8, Request/Response, is
an MEP already, so it didn't need to be converted. It is MEP #2b.) The
document is at
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs-iops_clean.htm
and it contains the following sections (some empty):
Introduction
Patterns - IOPs and MEP
Use Cases that Illustrate Differences Between IOPs and MEPs
Advantages of IOPs Over MEPs
Advantages of MEPs Over IOPs
The "Use Cases" section needs details and additional use cases. (They
don't have to have fancy diagrams either. Text is fine.) It is not
intended to enumerate all use cases that are relevant to WSDL. It is only
intended to list a few use cases that may be helpful in understanding the
difference between having the WSDL interface/portType model IOPs versus MEPs.
The "Advantages" sections are the main ones that I am hoping that this TF
can fill produce. Ideally I would like to nail down all the pros and cons
that we see of both ways of doing things, and then bring it to the WG as a
whole to make a decision.
Also, I'm not sure I got pattern 7 right. (Amy, would you take a look?)
--
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 22:55:26 UTC