- From: Jonathan Marsh via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:53:55 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/results/Woden/LocationTemplate-2G
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv6742/test-suite/results/Woden/LocationTemplate-2G
Added Files:
HTTPservice.results.xml
Log Message:
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jan/0122.html:
In order not to lose the few bindings that make sense under SOAP, I’ve cloned LocationTemplate-1G into LocationTemplate-2G which is an HTTP binding-only version. I twiddled a few other details to keep everything sufficiently unique (e.g. service name, whttp:location URLs, etc.)
I’ve cut the AutoRemainder, AdditionalQueryParams, and AutoQueryParams bindings from LocationTemplate-1G.
Since we’ve clarified that the {http location} is engaged on both soap-request and request-response MEPs, I cloned the remaining 4 operations and test them on the request-response MEP as well.
While doing this, I noticed some service names were not unique within the whole set of tests we’re doing, which is inconvenient for some implementations like Axis2. I updated MessageTest-2G,3G,4G service names (which should affect the component model more than the message tests.)
Also made sure queryParameterSeparater values were consistent with any query params explicitly specified in whttp:location.
--- NEW FILE: HTTPservice.results.xml ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../../results.xsl"?>
<comparing test-metadata="../../../documents/good/LocationTemplate-2G/TestMetadata.xml" source="../../../documents/good/LocationTemplate-2G/HTTPservice.wsdl" archetype="../../Baseline/LocationTemplate-2G/HTTPservice.canonical.wsdlcm" aspirant="../../Woden/LocationTemplate-2G/HTTPservice.canonical.wsdlcm" required-extensions="true">
<no-aspirant>No results found for this test</no-aspirant>
</comparing>
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 12:54:00 UTC