2002/ws/desc/test-suite Dashboard.html,1.29,1.30 test-suite.xml,1.42,1.43

Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/test-suite
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24104/test-suite

Modified Files:
	Dashboard.html test-suite.xml 
Log Message:
Added trailing slash to endpoint addresses in MessageTest-2G and 3G.  Fixed typo in Echo-2B url in test-cases.xml.  Regenerated all results.

Index: test-suite.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/test-suite.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -C 2 -d -r1.42 -r1.43
*** test-suite.xml	30 Nov 2006 21:58:54 -0000	1.42
--- test-suite.xml	5 Jan 2007 06:14:02 -0000	1.43
***************
*** 22,26 ****
  	<test-case id="Description-1B" href="documents/bad/Description-1B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="Description-2B" href="documents/bad/Description-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
! 	<test-case id="Echo-2B" href="documents/good/Echo-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="HTTPBinding-1B" href="documents/bad/HTTPBinding-1B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="HTTPBinding-2B" href="documents/bad/HTTPBinding-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
--- 22,26 ----
  	<test-case id="Description-1B" href="documents/bad/Description-1B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="Description-2B" href="documents/bad/Description-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
! 	<test-case id="Echo-2B" href="documents/bad/Echo-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="HTTPBinding-1B" href="documents/bad/HTTPBinding-1B/TestMetadata.xml"/>
  	<test-case id="HTTPBinding-2B" href="documents/bad/HTTPBinding-2B/TestMetadata.xml"/>

Index: Dashboard.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/Dashboard.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -C 2 -d -r1.29 -r1.30
*** Dashboard.html	5 Jan 2007 01:20:58 -0000	1.29
--- Dashboard.html	5 Jan 2007 06:14:02 -0000	1.30
***************
*** 15,19 ****
  					.explanatory {font-size:smaller}
  				</style></head><body><h2>WSDL 2.0 Interop Dashboard</h2><address>Generated January 4 2007,
! 						1350</address><p class="explanatory">This page summarizes the results of interop testing of the 
  					<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20">WSDL 2.0 Core</a> and 
  					<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a> specifications,
--- 15,19 ----
  					.explanatory {font-size:smaller}
  				</style></head><body><h2>WSDL 2.0 Interop Dashboard</h2><address>Generated January 4 2007,
! 						2155</address><p class="explanatory">This page summarizes the results of interop testing of the 
  					<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20">WSDL 2.0 Core</a> and 
  					<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a> specifications,
***************
*** 23,27 ****
  					is also measured.</p><table cellspacing="3"><tr><td class="group" colspan="4"><h3>Interop results</h3></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Component Model Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results/Interchange.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results test the results of parsing a WSDL 2.0 document, by generating an 
  								interchange format representing the component model in XML and comparing it against a baseline description
! 								of the component model.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><table><tr><td><strong>Woden</strong></td><td><strong>WSDL XSLT</strong></td><td><strong>Canon</strong></td></tr><tr><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">63</span><img alt="85% passed" width="170" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">10</span><img alt="14% failed" width="27" height="16" src="red.gif"></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="99% passed" width="197" height="16" src="green.gif"></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">66</span><img alt="89% passed" width="178" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">6</span><img alt="8% failed" width="16" heigh="16" src="red.gif"></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Message Exchange Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results represent the analysis of log files of message exchanges based
! 							on complex WSDL 2.0 documents, with each implementation run pair-wise against the others.</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><table xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/logs/"><thead><tr><th/><th><nobr>Canon</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>Canon</nobr></th><th><nobr>Canon</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr></th><th><nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>Canon</nobr></th><th><nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr></th></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-1G">MessageTest-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">32</span><img alt="76% passed" width="114" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">10</span><img alt="24% failed" width"36" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">9</span><img alt="21% passed" width="32" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">33</span><img alt="79% failed" width="118" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">9</span><img alt="21% passed" width="32" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">33</span><img alt="79% failed" width="118" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">8</span><img alt="19% passed" width="29" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">34</span><img alt="81% failed" width="121" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td></tr><tr><td><a href="reslts-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-4G">MessageTest-4G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-5G">MessageTest-5G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#ModuleComposition-1G">ModuleComposition-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#LocationTemplate-1G">LocationTemplate-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-2G">MessageTest-2G</a> (HTTP)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-3G">MessageTest-3G</a> (HTTP)</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Validation Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results/Validation.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results represent the analysis of validation log files generated by validating implementatons consuming both good and bad documents in the test suite.  Green and yellow both mean that the testcase was correctly validated, the difference being that a yellow indicates that the implementation did not correctly identify the specific assertion a "bad" testcase was designed fail on.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><table><thead><tr><td><strong>Woden</strong></td><td><strong>Canon</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><div style="border:1px solid black; width:201px; height:16px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">80</span><img alt="36.03603603603604% passed" width="72.07207207207207" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">32</span><img alt="14.414414414414415% passed" width="28.82882882882883" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">88</span><img alt="39.63963963963964% failed" width="79.27927927927928" height="16" src="red.gif"><span style="position:absolute">&nbsp;(22)</span></div></td><td><div style="border:1px olid black; width:201px; height:16px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">82</span><img alt="36.93693693693694% passed" width="73.87387387387388" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">66</span><img alt="29.72972972972973% passed" width="59.45945945945946" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="32.88288288288289% failed" width="65.76576576576578" height="16" src="red.gif"><span style="position:absolute">&nbsp;(1)</span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td class="group" colspan="4"><h3>Test Suite Completeness</h3></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Assertion Coverage</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="Assertion-coverage.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">Count of assertions violated by "bad" testcases, compared with the total number of assertions
  							identified in the specs.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><div style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:202px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">105</span><img alt="50% have coverage" width="100" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">105</span><img alt="50% have no coverage" width="100" height="16" src="red.gif"></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Test Case Coverage</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="Test-suite-coverage-summary.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">An analysis of the use of various parts of the WSDL syntax (elements, attributes, uris) in the test collection.  Green indicates 4 or more occurances of the construct, yellow indicates less than 4 occurances, and red indicates zero occurances.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><div style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:202px; height:18px; font-size:xsmall; font-weight:bold; margin:0px"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="70% have good coverage" width="141" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">29</span><img alt="29% have minimal coverage" width="57" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">1</span><img alt="1% have no coverage" width="2" height="16" src="red.gif"></div></td></tr></table></body></html>
\ No newline at end of file
--- 23,27 ----
  					is also measured.</p><table cellspacing="3"><tr><td class="group" colspan="4"><h3>Interop results</h3></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Component Model Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results/Interchange.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results test the results of parsing a WSDL 2.0 document, by generating an 
  								interchange format representing the component model in XML and comparing it against a baseline description
! 								of the component model.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><table><tr><td><strong>Woden</strong></td><td><strong>WSDL XSLT</strong></td><td><strong>Canon</strong></td></tr><tr><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">65</span><img alt="88% passed" width="176" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">8</span><img alt="11% failed" width="22" height="16" src="red.gif"></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="99% passed" width="197" height="16" src="green.gif"></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:201px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">66</span><img alt="89% passed" width="178" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">6</span><img alt="8% failed" width="16" height"16" src="red.gif"></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Message Exchange Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results represent the analysis of log files of message exchanges based
! 							on complex WSDL 2.0 documents, with each implementation run pair-wise against the others.</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><table xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/logs/"><thead><tr><th/><th><nobr>Canon</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>Canon</nobr></th><th><nobr>Canon</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr></th><th><nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>Canon</nobr></th><th><nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr> &gt;&gt; <nobr>WSO2 WSAS</nobr></th></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><thead><tr><th/></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-1G">MessageTest-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">32</span><img alt="76% passed" width="114" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">10</span><img alt="24% failed" width"36" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">9</span><img alt="21% passed" width="32" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">33</span><img alt="79% failed" width="118" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">9</span><img alt="21% passed" width="32" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">33</span><img alt="79% failed" width="118" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td><td style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:150px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">8</span><img alt="19% passed" width="29" height="16" src="green.gif"/><span style="position:absolute">34</span><img alt="81% failed" width="121" height="16" src="red.gif"/></td></tr><tr><td><a href="reslts-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-4G">MessageTest-4G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-5G">MessageTest-5G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#ModuleComposition-1G">ModuleComposition-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#LocationTemplate-1G">LocationTemplate-1G</a> (SOAP12)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-2G">MessageTest-2G</a> (HTTP)</td></tr><tr><td><a href="results-messages/Message-tests-results.html#MessageTest-3G">MessageTest-3G</a> (HTTP)</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Validation Test Results</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="results/Validation.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">These results represent the analysis of validation log files generated by validating implementatons consuming both good and bad documents in the test suite.  Green and yellow both mean that the testcase was correctly validated, the difference being that a yellow indicates that the implementation did not correctly identify the specific assertion a "bad" testcase was designed fail on.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><table><thead><tr><td><strong>Woden</strong></td><td><strong>Canon</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><div style="border:1px solid black; width:201px; height:16px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">83</span><img alt="37.38738738738739% passed" width="74.77477477477478" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">32</span><img alt="14.414414414414415% passed" width="28.82882882882883" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">85</span><img alt="38.288288288288285% failed" width="76.57657657657657" height="16" src="red.gif"><span style="position:absolute">&nbsp;(22)</span></div></td><td><div style="border:1pxsolid black; width:201px; height:16px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">82</span><img alt="36.93693693693694% passed" width="73.87387387387388" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">66</span><img alt="29.72972972972973% passed" width="59.45945945945946" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="32.88288288288289% failed" width="65.76576576576578" height="16" src="red.gif"><span style="position:absolute">&nbsp;(1)</span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td class="group" colspan="4"><h3>Test Suite Completeness</h3></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Assertion Coverage</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="Assertion-coverage.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">Count of assertions violated by "bad" testcases, compared with the total number of assertions
  							identified in the specs.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><div style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:202px; height:18px; font-size:x-small; font-weight:bold"><span style="position:absolute">105</span><img alt="50% have coverage" width="100" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">105</span><img alt="50% have no coverage" width="100" height="16" src="red.gif"></div></td></tr><tr><td colspan="4"><hr></td></tr><tr><td><div class="heading">Test Case Coverage</div></td><td><p class="explanatory">(<a href="Test-suite-coverage-summary.html">details</a>)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p class="explanatory">An analysis of the use of various parts of the WSDL syntax (elements, attributes, uris) in the test collection.  Green indicates 4 or more occurances of the construct, yellow indicates less than 4 occurances, and red indicates zero occurances.</p></td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"><div style="border:1px solid black; padding:0px; width:202px; height:18px; font-size:xsmall; font-weight:bold; margin:0px"><span style="position:absolute">73</span><img alt="70% have good coverage" width="141" height="16" src="green.gif"><span style="position:absolute">29</span><img alt="29% have minimal coverage" width="57" height="16" src="yellow.gif"><span style="position:absolute">1</span><img alt="1% have no coverage" width="2" height="16" src="red.gif"></div></td></tr></table></body></html>
\ No newline at end of file

Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 06:14:46 UTC