- From: Jacek Kopecky via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:21:35 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv5136 Modified Files: wsdl20-rdf.html Log Message: references added Index: wsdl20-rdf.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -C2 -d -r1.17 -r1.18 *** wsdl20-rdf.html 28 Feb 2006 09:36:08 -0000 1.17 --- wsdl20-rdf.html 14 Mar 2006 09:21:33 -0000 1.18 *************** *** 147,150 **** --- 147,151 ---- 4.5 <a href="#diff-restrictions">Other WSDL restrictions not enforced by the ontology</a><br /> + 5. <a href="#references">References</a><br /> </p> *************** *** 190,194 **** service.</p> ! <p>The main objective of this specification is to present a standard RDF vocabulary equivalent to WSDL 2, so that WSDL 2 documents can be transformed into RDF and merged with other Semantic Web data.</p> --- 191,196 ---- service.</p> ! <p>The main objective of this specification is to present a standard RDF ([<a ! href="#rdf">RDF</a>]) and OWL ([<a href="#owl">OWL</a>]) vocabulary equivalent to WSDL 2, so that WSDL 2 documents can be transformed into RDF and merged with other Semantic Web data.</p> *************** *** 222,226 **** <p>This section describes the OWL ontology for WSDL, comparing it to the WSDL ! component model defined in <a href="#todo">WSDL2 Core</a>. While the text in this section may imply how the components might be mapped to their RDF representation, such implications are not intended to be normative, as this --- 224,228 ---- <p>This section describes the OWL ontology for WSDL, comparing it to the WSDL ! component model defined in [<a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core Language</a>]. While the text in this section may imply how the components might be mapped to their RDF representation, such implications are not intended to be normative, as this *************** *** 233,242 **** 4</a>.</p> ! <p>The ontological equivalents for the core WSDL components defined in <a ! href="#todo">WSDL2 Core</a> are described in <a href="#core">section 2.1</a>. All these components are extensible, so <a href="#extensions">section 2.2</a> describes how extensions are mapped to RDF. The following sections, from 2.3 to 2.7, describe the ontological equivalents for ! the various adjuncts specified in <a href="#todo">WSDL2 Adjuncts</a>.</p> <!-- todo add text or subsection on naming conventions - camel case, classes --- 235,245 ---- 4</a>.</p> ! <p>The ontological equivalents for the core WSDL components defined in [<a ! href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core Language</a>] are described in <a href="#core">section 2.1</a>. All these components are extensible, so <a href="#extensions">section 2.2</a> describes how extensions are mapped to RDF. The following sections, from 2.3 to 2.7, describe the ontological equivalents for ! the various adjuncts specified in [<a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 ! Adjuncts</a>].</p> <!-- todo add text or subsection on naming conventions - camel case, classes *************** *** 356,360 **** <code>Interface</code> instance is pointed to using the property <code>interface</code>. Binding types (for example SOAP binding or HTTP ! binding, as specified in <a href="#todo">WSDL2 adjuncts</a>) are themselves classes in RDF, so a binding type is indicated by belonging to the appropriate class (using the property <code>rdf:type</code>).</p> --- 359,363 ---- <code>Interface</code> instance is pointed to using the property <code>interface</code>. Binding types (for example SOAP binding or HTTP ! binding, as specified in [<a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a>]) are themselves classes in RDF, so a binding type is indicated by belonging to the appropriate class (using the property <code>rdf:type</code>).</p> *************** *** 534,539 **** <p>WSDL 2 Adjuncts contain a single predefined extension, called Operation Safety, which adds a property to interface operation components to indicate ! whether an interface operation is known to be safe in terms of <a ! href="#todo">Web Architecture</a>.</p> <p>In the RDF representation of WSDL, we introduce the class --- 537,542 ---- <p>WSDL 2 Adjuncts contain a single predefined extension, called Operation Safety, which adds a property to interface operation components to indicate ! whether an interface operation is known to be safe in terms of [<a ! href="#webarch">Web Architecture</a>].</p> <p>In the RDF representation of WSDL, we introduce the class *************** *** 638,644 **** <h2 id="example">3. Example WSDL document in RDF form</h2> ! <p>The following is an N3 (todo ref) listing of the RDF form of the WSDL description of the initial GreatH Web Service (listed as example 2-1) from ! the WSDL 2.0 primer:</p> <pre> --- 641,647 ---- <h2 id="example">3. Example WSDL document in RDF form</h2> ! <p>The following is a listing of the RDF form of the WSDL description of the initial GreatH Web Service (listed as example 2-1) from ! the WSDL 2.0 primer (in triple notation):</p> <pre> *************** *** 775,779 **** <p>In the RDF representation, all WSDL components are identified with their ! respective component designators (see todo ref), which are URIs generally constructed from the name and namespace of the component and from its parent component hierarchy. The original names and namespaces are not explicitly --- 778,785 ---- <p>In the RDF representation, all WSDL components are identified with their ! respective component designators (see [<a href="WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core ! Language</a>] appendix C <a ! href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060106/#wsdl-iri-references">IRI-References for WSDL 2.0 ! Components</a>), which are URIs generally constructed from the name and namespace of the component and from its parent component hierarchy. The original names and namespaces are not explicitly *************** *** 790,794 **** <p>The component designators put the names of the components in the fragment ! identifier part of the resulting URIs. On the Web [todo ref webarch], the interpretation of fragment identifiers is defined by the MIME media type of the representation of the resource identified by the URI without the fragment --- 796,801 ---- <p>The component designators put the names of the components in the fragment ! identifier part of the resulting URIs. On the Web (see [<a ! href="#webarch">Web Architecture</a>]), the interpretation of fragment identifiers is defined by the MIME media type of the representation of the resource identified by the URI without the fragment *************** *** 864,868 **** particular identifier IRIs, not represented as literals. For example, most instances representing components are identified with their component ! designators (see todo ref) and all references point directly there — an operation within a binding points to its respective interface operation using the interface operation component designator IRI, whereas in the XML syntax --- 871,878 ---- particular identifier IRIs, not represented as literals. For example, most instances representing components are identified with their component ! designators (see [<a href="WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core ! Language</a>] appendix C <a ! href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060106/#wsdl-iri-references">IRI-References for WSDL 2.0 ! Components</a>) and all references point directly there — an operation within a binding points to its respective interface operation using the interface operation component designator IRI, whereas in the XML syntax *************** *** 930,933 **** --- 940,999 ---- </ul> + <h2 id="references">5. References</h2> + + <dl> + + <dt class="label"><a name="owl" id="owl"></a>[OWL]</dt> + <dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/">OWL Web Ontology + Language Reference</a></cite>, Mike Dean,Guus Schreiber, Editors. + W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004 . Available at + http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/</dd> + + <dt class="label"><a name="rdf" id="rdf"></a>[RDF]</dt> + <dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/">Resource + Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract + Syntax</a></cite>, Graham Klyne, Jeremy J. Carroll, Editors. W3C + Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available at + http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/</dd> + + <dt class="label"><a name="webarch" id="webarch"></a>[Web + Architecture]</dt> + <dd><cite><a href= + "http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/">Architecture of + the World Wide Web, Volume One</a></cite>, Ian Jacobs, Norman + Walsh, Editors. W3C Recommendation, 15 December, 2004. Available at + http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/ .</dd> + + <dt class="label"><a name="WSDL-PART1" id="WSDL-PART1"></a>[WSDL + 2.0 Core Language]</dt> + <dd><cite><a href=" + http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060106">Web Services + Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core + Language</a></cite>, R. Chinnici, M. Gudgin, J-J. Moreau, S. + Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 6 January 2006. + This version of the "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) + Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language" Specification is available is + available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060106. The + <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20">latest version of "Web + Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core + Language"</a> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20.</dd> + + <dt class="label"><a name="WSDL-PART2" id="WSDL-PART2"></a>[WSDL + 2.0 Adjuncts]</dt> + <dd><cite><a href= + "http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-adjuncts-20060106">Web + Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: + Adjuncts</a></cite> , R. Chinnici, H. Haas, A. Lewis, J-J. Moreau, + D. Orchard, S. Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 6 + January 2006. This version of the "Web Services Description + Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts" Specification is + available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-adjuncts-20060106. + The <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts">latest version + of "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: + Adjuncts"</a> is available at + http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts.</dd> + + </dl> + <h2 id="ontologysource">appendix A: the owl ontology source</h2> *************** *** 939,945 **** <p>todo: mapping there, not really back, certainly not roundtrip</p> - <p id='todo'>todo, plus references</p> - - </div> </body> --- 1005,1008 ----
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 09:21:43 UTC