- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:23:56 -0500
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org, public-ws-desc-eds-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:24:15 UTC
Hugo, Good catch. Thx. However, the consistent spelling is ParentId, and I renamed it in Part 1. Here's why ID is a type. Each component has an ID. Id(x) is a mapping that gives the ID for the component x. Z Notation is case-sensitive so there is no conflict between ID and Id() ParentId(x) is also a mapping. It gives the ID of the parent component for the nested component x. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> Sent by: public-ws-desc-eds-request@w3.org 11/22/2005 05:31 AM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org Subject ParentId/ParentID in Part 1 Hi Arthur. There were some inconsistencies in Part 1 about ParentId/ParentID. I renamed them all ParentID. Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:24:15 UTC