W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org > May 2005

2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 wsdl20-primer.xml,1.77,1.78

From: Arthur Ryman via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:39:06 +0000
To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1DSN5e-0004Y5-Nj@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv17471

Modified Files:
	wsdl20-primer.xml 
Log Message:
Removed my ednote about inline schemas.

Index: wsdl20-primer.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.77
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -C2 -d -r1.77 -r1.78
*** wsdl20-primer.xml	1 May 2005 15:07:49 -0000	1.77
--- wsdl20-primer.xml	1 May 2005 22:39:04 -0000	1.78
***************
*** 2342,2359 ****
  			<div2 id="adv-multiple-inline-schemas">
  				<head>Importing Schemas</head>
- 				<ednote>
- 					<name>Arthur</name>
- 					<date>20050329</date>
- 					<edtext>I find the
- 						resolution of the thread to be very
- 						unsatisfactory since it doesn't nail down the
- 						expected behavior of a WSDL processor when the
- 						schemaLocation is omitted. I'd prefer the spec
- 						to say that a WSDL processor that encounters an
- 						inline schema MUST remember that fact and use it
- 						to locate the schema should it appear in an
- 						import element without a schemaLocation.
- 					</edtext>
- 				</ednote>
  				
  				<p>
--- 2342,2345 ----
Received on Sunday, 1 May 2005 22:39:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:37 UTC