- From: David Booth via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:34:03 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv29766 Modified Files: wsdl20-primer.xml wsdl20-primer.html Log Message: Removed obsolete ednote. Index: wsdl20-primer.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.xml,v retrieving revision 1.59 retrieving revision 1.60 diff -C2 -d -r1.59 -r1.60 *** wsdl20-primer.xml 18 Apr 2005 14:08:29 -0000 1.59 --- wsdl20-primer.xml 21 Apr 2005 17:34:00 -0000 1.60 *************** *** 928,938 **** </description> </eg> ! <ednote> ! <name>KevinL</name> ! <date>20040527</date> ! <edtext> ! Need clarification - infault outfault are missing from the binding operation syntax. Is it an oversight? ! </edtext> ! </ednote> --- 928,932 ---- </description> </eg> ! Index: wsdl20-primer.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.html,v retrieving revision 1.40 retrieving revision 1.41 diff -C2 -d -r1.40 -r1.41 *** wsdl20-primer.html 18 Apr 2005 14:08:29 -0000 1.40 --- wsdl20-primer.html 21 Apr 2005 17:34:01 -0000 1.41 *************** *** 308,312 **** Binding Extension</a><br />         6.6.1 <a ! href="#id5209857">Explanation of Example</a><br />     6.7 <a href="#adv-get-vs-post">HTTP GET Versus POST: Which to Use?</a><br /> --- 308,312 ---- Binding Extension</a><br />         6.6.1 <a ! href="#id5209838">Explanation of Example</a><br />     6.7 <a href="#adv-get-vs-post">HTTP GET Versus POST: Which to Use?</a><br /> *************** *** 366,376 **** href="#adv-multiple-inline-schemas">Importing Schemas</a><br />         7.10.1 <a ! href="#id5213392">Schemas in Imported Documents</a><br />         7.10.2 <a ! href="#id5213696">Multiple Inline Schemas in One Document</a><br />         7.10.3 <a href="#adv-schema-location">The schemaLocation Attribute</a><br />             7.10.3.1 ! <a href="#id5213880">Using the id Attribute to Identify Inline Schemas</a><br />     7.11 <a href="#adv-rdf-mapping">Mapping to --- 366,376 ---- href="#adv-multiple-inline-schemas">Importing Schemas</a><br />         7.10.1 <a ! href="#id5213373">Schemas in Imported Documents</a><br />         7.10.2 <a ! href="#id5213677">Multiple Inline Schemas in One Document</a><br />         7.10.3 <a href="#adv-schema-location">The schemaLocation Attribute</a><br />             7.10.3.1 ! <a href="#id5213946">Using the id Attribute to Identify Inline Schemas</a><br />     7.11 <a href="#adv-rdf-mapping">Mapping to *************** *** 2856,2873 **** </div> - <table border="1" summary="Editorial note: KevinL"> - <tr> - <td align="left" valign="top" width="50%"><b>Editorial note: - KevinL</b></td> - <td align="right" valign="top" width="50%">20040527</td> - </tr> - - <tr> - <td colspan="2" align="left" valign="top">Need clarification - - infault outfault are missing from the binding operation syntax. Is - it an oversight?</td> - </tr> - </table> - <p>The <code>binding</code> syntax parallels the syntax of <code>interface</code>: each interface construct has a binding --- 2856,2859 ----
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2005 17:34:03 UTC