- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:25:37 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18063
Modified Files:
wsdl20.xml
Log Message:
LC 78, part 2 (unique identifier for Interface Fault components)
Index: wsdl20.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.215
retrieving revision 1.216
diff -C2 -d -r1.215 -r1.216
*** wsdl20.xml 19 Apr 2005 17:55:21 -0000 1.215
--- wsdl20.xml 20 Apr 2005 08:25:35 -0000 1.216
***************
*** 2199,2217 ****
<p>For each Interface Fault component in the {interface faults}
property of an Interface component, the {name} property must be unique.</p>
!
! <p>Interface Fault components are local to Interface
! components; they cannot be referred to by QName, despite
! having a {name} property
! (see <specref ref='frag-ids' />). That is,
! two Interface components whose {name} property share the same namespace name
! but with different local names MAY contain
! Interface Fault components which share the same {name}
! property. Thus, the {name} property
! of the Interface Fault components are not sufficient to
! form the unique identity of an Interface Fault
! component. To uniquely identify an Interface Fault
! component one must first identify the Interface component (by
! QName) and then identify the Interface Fault within that
! Interface component (by a further QName).</p>
<p>In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more
--- 2199,2213 ----
<p>For each Interface Fault component in the {interface faults}
property of an Interface component, the {name} property must be unique.</p>
!
! <p>Interface Fault components are uniquely identified by the
! the QName of the enclosing Interface component and QName of the
! Interface Fault component itself.</p>
!
! <note><p>Despite having a {name} property, Interface Fault components
! cannot be identified solely by their QName. Indeed, two Interface components
! whose {name} property value has the same namespace name, but different local names,
! can contain Interface Fault components wich the same {name} property value. Thus,
! the {name} property of Interface Fault components is not sufficient to form the unique
! identity of an Interface Fault component.</p></note>
<p>In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 08:25:39 UTC