- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:25:37 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18063 Modified Files: wsdl20.xml Log Message: LC 78, part 2 (unique identifier for Interface Fault components) Index: wsdl20.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml,v retrieving revision 1.215 retrieving revision 1.216 diff -C2 -d -r1.215 -r1.216 *** wsdl20.xml 19 Apr 2005 17:55:21 -0000 1.215 --- wsdl20.xml 20 Apr 2005 08:25:35 -0000 1.216 *************** *** 2199,2217 **** <p>For each Interface Fault component in the {interface faults} property of an Interface component, the {name} property must be unique.</p> ! ! <p>Interface Fault components are local to Interface ! components; they cannot be referred to by QName, despite ! having a {name} property ! (see <specref ref='frag-ids' />). That is, ! two Interface components whose {name} property share the same namespace name ! but with different local names MAY contain ! Interface Fault components which share the same {name} ! property. Thus, the {name} property ! of the Interface Fault components are not sufficient to ! form the unique identity of an Interface Fault ! component. To uniquely identify an Interface Fault ! component one must first identify the Interface component (by ! QName) and then identify the Interface Fault within that ! Interface component (by a further QName).</p> <p>In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more --- 2199,2213 ---- <p>For each Interface Fault component in the {interface faults} property of an Interface component, the {name} property must be unique.</p> ! ! <p>Interface Fault components are uniquely identified by the ! the QName of the enclosing Interface component and QName of the ! Interface Fault component itself.</p> ! ! <note><p>Despite having a {name} property, Interface Fault components ! cannot be identified solely by their QName. Indeed, two Interface components ! whose {name} property value has the same namespace name, but different local names, ! can contain Interface Fault components wich the same {name} property value. Thus, ! the {name} property of Interface Fault components is not sufficient to form the unique ! identity of an Interface Fault component.</p></note> <p>In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 08:25:39 UTC