- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sweeraw@dev.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:39:01 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv31765
Modified Files:
wsdl20.html wsdl20.xml
Log Message:
added proc. conf. rules note on optionality
Index: wsdl20.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html,v
retrieving revision 1.109
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -C2 -d -r1.109 -r1.110
*** wsdl20.html 26 Jul 2004 19:18:23 -0000 1.109
--- wsdl20.html 26 Jul 2004 19:38:59 -0000 1.110
***************
*** 5799,5806 ****
<li>
! <p>A conformant WSDL processor MAY safely ignore a NON-mandatory
! extension that it does not recognize or that it does not choose
! to implement.
</p>
</li>
--- 5799,5820 ----
<li>
! <p>A conformant WSDL processor MAY safely ignore a
! NON-mandatory extension or feature that it does not
! recognize or that it does not choose to implement.
</p>
+
+ <div class="note"><p class="prefix"><b>Note:</b></p><p>If a WSDL document declares an extension or feature
+ as optional, then if that extension or feature could apply
+ to messages sent by the provider agent as well, then the
+ provider agent MUST NOT send any messages that requires the
+ requester agent to support that extension or feature. The
+ requestor, on the othe hand, MAY engage that extension or
+ feature in messages it sends to the provider.</p>
+
+ <p>If finer-grain control of extensions and features is
+ desired then such extensions and features must be designed
+ in a direction (from requestor or from provider) sensitive
+ manner so that any direction may be marked required or
+ optional.</p></div>
</li>
***************
*** 6886,6889 ****
--- 6900,6909 ----
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20040727</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SW</td>
+ <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Added note to processor conf rules for optional extensions
+ and features about what optional means.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20040727</td>
+ <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SW</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Removed contentious area ed note thing per decision to
do those via minority opinions.</td>
***************
*** 7676,7680 ****
namespaces to <a href="#InterfaceOperation_details"><b>2.4.1 The Interface Operation Component</b></a></td>
</tr>
-
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20030122</td>
--- 7696,7699 ----
Index: wsdl20.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.119
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -C2 -d -r1.119 -r1.120
*** wsdl20.xml 26 Jul 2004 19:18:24 -0000 1.119
--- wsdl20.xml 26 Jul 2004 19:38:59 -0000 1.120
***************
*** 5764,5771 ****
<item>
! <p>A conformant WSDL processor MAY safely ignore a NON-mandatory
! extension that it does not recognize or that it does not choose
! to implement.
</p>
</item>
--- 5764,5785 ----
<item>
! <p>A conformant WSDL processor MAY safely ignore a
! NON-mandatory extension or feature that it does not
! recognize or that it does not choose to implement.
</p>
+
+ <note><p>If a WSDL document declares an extension or feature
+ as optional, then if that extension or feature could apply
+ to messages sent by the provider agent as well, then the
+ provider agent MUST NOT send any messages that requires the
+ requester agent to support that extension or feature. The
+ requestor, on the othe hand, MAY engage that extension or
+ feature in messages it sends to the provider.</p>
+
+ <p>If finer-grain control of extensions and features is
+ desired then such extensions and features must be designed
+ in a direction (from requestor or from provider) sensitive
+ manner so that any direction may be marked required or
+ optional.</p></note>
</item>
***************
*** 6871,6874 ****
--- 6885,6894 ----
<td>20040727</td>
<td>SW</td>
+ <td>Added note to processor conf rules for optional extensions
+ and features about what optional means.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>20040727</td>
+ <td>SW</td>
<td>Removed contentious area ed note thing per decision to
do those via minority opinions.</td>
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 15:42:30 UTC