2002/ws/desc/wsdl20 wsdl20.html,1.95,1.96 wsdl20.xml,1.104,1.105

Update of /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18568

Modified Files:
	wsdl20.html wsdl20.xml 
Log Message:
added conformance stmt that supporting any specific xml version is not required

Index: wsdl20.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html,v
retrieving revision 1.95
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -C2 -d -r1.95 -r1.96
*** wsdl20.html	13 Jul 2004 17:09:25 -0000	1.95
--- wsdl20.html	13 Jul 2004 17:15:59 -0000	1.96
***************
*** 5427,5430 ****
--- 5427,5436 ----
      all the constraints contained in this specification.</p>
  
+     <p>Note that the WSDL language is defined in terms of the
+     component model defined by this specification. As such, it is
+     explicitly NOT a conformance requirement to be able to process
+     document encoded in a particular version of XML, in particular XML
+     1.1.</p>
+ 
    </div>
  	
***************
*** 6570,6573 ****
--- 6576,6585 ----
   <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20040713</td>
   <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SW</td>
+  <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Added negative conformance criteria: not required to process
+  XML1.1 etc.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+  <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20040713</td>
+  <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">SW</td>
   <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corrected reference to frag ID syntax to for issue 209</td>
  </tr>

Index: wsdl20.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.104
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -C2 -d -r1.104 -r1.105
*** wsdl20.xml	13 Jul 2004 17:09:25 -0000	1.104
--- wsdl20.xml	13 Jul 2004 17:15:59 -0000	1.105
***************
*** 5419,5422 ****
--- 5419,5428 ----
      all the constraints contained in this specification.</p>
  
+     <p>Note that the WSDL language is defined in terms of the
+     component model defined by this specification. As such, it is
+     explicitly NOT a conformance requirement to be able to process
+     document encoded in a particular version of XML, in particular XML
+     1.1.</p>
+ 
    </div2>
  	
***************
*** 6576,6579 ****
--- 6582,6591 ----
   <td>20040713</td>
   <td>SW</td>
+  <td>Added negative conformance criteria: not required to process
+  XML1.1 etc.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+  <td>20040713</td>
+  <td>SW</td>
   <td>Corrected reference to frag ID syntax to for issue 209</td>
  </tr>

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 13:16:16 UTC