- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:47:45 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Cc: "'Eric Foutz'" <eric_foutz@symantec.com>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org, public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF67457FAC.36A9D6D8-ON85257261.00536F37-85257261.0056C4C1@ca.ibm.com>
I agree that this could be handled by an extension. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com> Sent by: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org 01/11/2007 06:49 PM To "'Eric Foutz'" <eric_foutz@symantec.com> cc <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org> Subject RE: WSDL enhancement request Thank you for this comment. The Working Group this issue as a CR121 [1]. The Working Group is in the last stages of interop testing for WSDL 2.0, after 5 years in development. At this point the Working Group is unwilling to add new functionality, despite deprecation being an interesting topic. A future version of WSDL might accommodate this (if there is one) but in the meantime it would be possible to use WSDL extensions to describe the deprecation of an operation. Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of January, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR121 Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Eric Foutz Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:54 AM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: WSDL enhancement request We would like the WSDL format to support deprecation. If I deprecate a web method in my java middleware I would like it to show up as obsolete in my .Net client.
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 15:48:07 UTC