RE: Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the same requirement?

Thank you for this comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR108 [1].

 

As a result of this comment, the Working Group removed the entire assertion
MessageLabel-0006, and correspondingly MessageLabel-0004 [2, 3].

 

Unless you let us know otherwise by mid-January, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR108  

[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Binding_Message_Reference_Mapping 

[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?rev=1.30
1
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?rev=1.3
01&content-type=text/html#InterfaceMessageReference_Mapping>
&content-type=text/html#InterfaceMessageReference_Mapping

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

  _____  

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:32 AM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Do MessageLabel-0006 and MessageLabel-0014 state the same
requirement?

 


MessageLabel-0006 states 
The messageLabel attribute information item of a binding message reference
element information item MUST be present if the message exchange pattern has
more than one placeholder message with {direction} equal to the message
direction.
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?con
tent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#MessageLabel-0006-summary> † 

MessageLabel-0014 states 
If the messageLabel attribute information item of a binding message
reference element information item is absent then there MUST be a unique
placeholder message with {direction} equal to the message direction.
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?con
tent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#MessageLabel-0014-summary> † 

The way I read these assertions the first states the requirement for a
message label in terms of the binding message reference and the second
states the requirement in terms of the interface message reference. 

Do these two assertions state the same requirement? 

Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com