- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:10:10 -0800
- To: "'youenn fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for this comment. The Working Group this issue as a CR109 [1]. The latest editor's draft [2] adds such an assertion. Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR109 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#soap-fault-decl-relate Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of youenn fablet > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:04 AM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: SOAP Fault code issue > > > Hi all, > > Related to MessageTest-1G document, I have the following comment with > the specification. > Currently, the soap fault code property can take any qname value. > It is fine for soap 1.1 but soap 1.2 constraints the qname value to be > in a set of 5 predefined QNames. > It would be good if we could put an assertion to the spec stating that > if soap1.2 is engaged the fault code qname must be in the predefined > QName set. > > Regards, > Youenn
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 19:10:12 UTC