W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > February 2007

RE: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:27:16 -0800
To: <chinthaka@wso2.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <030b01c75158$d90e1860$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

Thank you for this comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR091 [1]. 

The latest editor's draft [2] describes how the fault element structure
becomes the value of the Detail element.

Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR091 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Eran Chinthaka
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:00 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding
> Hi,
> I have a primitive question on SOAP binding of faults :)
> Assume a fault is defined in an operation, and let's assume the fault is
> referring to the element foo in the types section. When a fault occurs
> how would be the SOAP message looks like? Where will this Foo element go?
> From my little WSDL 1.1 knowledge, Foo element comes under Detail
> element, when it is a SOAP 1.2 fault. Is this the same for WSDL 2.0?
> Where should this be defined? I can not find details on this in any of
> the docs of the spec. Seems I am missing something some where :(
> The spec mentions that one can specify about Code and Subcode to be used
> inside the binding element. But there is no mentioning anywhere about
> the above case.
> If you want me to more clear on this, please look at the GreatH wsdl
> (http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb//2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/GreatH-
> 1G/).
> When the server throws an InvalidDataFault, how will the SOAP message
> coming to the client from it. What should it contain?
> I presume the fault should be bound to Detail element, but like to have
> a confirmation on this.
> Thanks,
> Chinthaka
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:27:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:06 UTC