Friday, 23 February 2007
Thursday, 22 February 2007
- FW: InterfaceMessageReference-1205002
- RE: InterfaceMessageReference-1205002
- Re: Clarify 'scope' of {element declarations} and {type definitions} re SparqlQuerySimplified-1G
- RE: {element declaration} for Interface Fault component
Wednesday, 21 February 2007
Tuesday, 20 February 2007
- RE: rpc:signature question.
- RE: HTTP Location property definition
- RE: Tranfer-Encoding vs Content-Encoding
- RE: SOAP Response and IRI style
Friday, 16 February 2007
- FW: Turning off http transfer coding
- RE: SOAP Fault code issue
- RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-)
- RE: Leftovers of trailing slashes in replacement parameters
- RE: Proposal for CR108
- RE: Interface Inheritance Clarification
- RE: New interchange results
- RE: problem with pattern attribute definition?
- FW: editorial: features and properties in "xml representation" sections
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding
- FW: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults
- RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-)
- RE: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1
- RE: Ignoring uncited and nillable
- RE: Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts
- RE: Spelling mistake in Part 2
- RE: {http location} ignored on SOAP request-response MEP?
- RE: Question on double curly braces with HTTP Location
- RE: HTTP Method selection
- RE: Missing attribute in section 6.2
- RE: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location
Thursday, 15 February 2007
- RE: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location
- RE: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs
- RE: SOAP Response query string issue
- RE: Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding
- RE: Semantics of {http cookies} Property.
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions]
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding
- RE: Two comments and a question on the WSDL HTTP Binding Extension