RE: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified?

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR076 [1].

 

The Working Group accepted your proposal.  The change is reflected in the
latest editor's draft [2].

 

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR076 

[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#InterfaceOperation_RPC_Signature_De
finition

 

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

  _____  

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:27 AM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified?

 

AIUI, this fulfills AIs assigned variously to me and John Kaputin.

 

Section 4.1.1 of the Adjuncts specifies {rpc signature} as a required
property.  Per our recent clarifications, this will appear in the component
model whenever the implementation supports the rpc extension.  Thus, even if
the {style} property does not include the rpc-style uri, the {rpc signature}
property will appear.  No default value is supplied either.

 

Instead, I believe it would be cleaner to make the {rpc property} optional,
and state that when the rpc style is engaged, the property MUST appear.

 

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#InterfaceOperation_RPC_Signature_De
finition

 

 

 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][   <mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com> jmarsh@microsoft.com
][  http://auburnmarshes.spaces.msn.com  ]