W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2006

RE: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:45:26 -0700
To: "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jonathan@wso2.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f101c6f153$406be430$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR076 [1].


The Working Group accepted your proposal.  The change is reflected in the
latest editor's draft [2].


Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR076 




Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com



From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:27 AM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified?


AIUI, this fulfills AIs assigned variously to me and John Kaputin.


Section 4.1.1 of the Adjuncts specifies {rpc signature} as a required
property.  Per our recent clarifications, this will appear in the component
model whenever the implementation supports the rpc extension.  Thus, even if
the {style} property does not include the rpc-style uri, the {rpc signature}
property will appear.  No default value is supplied either.


Instead, I believe it would be cleaner to make the {rpc property} optional,
and state that when the rpc style is engaged, the property MUST appear.





 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][   <mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com> jmarsh@microsoft.com
][  http://auburnmarshes.spaces.msn.com  ]

Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 18:52:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:05 UTC