W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2006

RE: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:31:41 -0700
To: "John Kaputin" <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: <woden-dev@ws.apache.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00d801c6f151$54d02550$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR072 [1].


The Working Group closed this issue as a duplicate of CR050 [2] and CR035
[3].  The typo is a duplicate of CR056 [4].  Please refer to those issues
for details of the resolution.


Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR072 

[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR050  

[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR035 

[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR056  



Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com



"John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com> 

05/23/2006 04:10 PM 

Please respond to




woden-dev@ws.apache.org, "John Kaputin" <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com> 


Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties




Some questions arose while implementing HTTP extensions from Part 2

In 6.3.1 HTTP Method Selection at [1]  is there a default value for {http
method} if the {safety} property is "false"?

In 3.1 Operation Safety at [2] the {safety} property is defined as REQUIRED
with a default value of "false" if not specified in the WSDL, so is the
wording at [1] "...if a {safety} property ... is present ..." redundant
(i.e. {safety} will always be present)?

And there's a possible typo in section 3.1 at [2].  The assertion refers to
"...a safe interaction defined in Section 3.5 of [
.html#webarch> Web Architecture]". I think this should say Section 3.4 (i.e.
section 3.4 Safe Interactions).


John Kaputin 
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 18:31:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:05 UTC