- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:09:51 -0700
- To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001501c6ec9f$af0b33e0$ffad1bac@DELLICIOUS>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a CR041 [1]. The Working Group agreed with the sentiment, but found that the assertion in the latest editor's draft [2] covers this adequately, so no change to the spec was deemed necessary. Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR041 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-headers-decl-relate Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:14 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 In the {http headers} property, is the {name} of the HTTP Header component, a key? i.e., is each HTTP Header component in {http headers} uniquely identified by it's {name}? This is implied by 6.5.6 IRI Identification Of An HTTP Header component which uses the {name} in the frag id, so it had better be unique. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 19:10:18 UTC