W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2006

RE: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:09:51 -0700
To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001501c6ec9f$af0b33e0$ffad1bac@DELLICIOUS>
Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR041 [1].


The Working Group agreed with the sentiment, but found that the assertion in
the latest editor's draft [2] covers this adequately, so no change to the
spec was deemed necessary.


Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR041



Jonathan Marsh  -   <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com  -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com



From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:14 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2


In the {http headers} property, is the {name} of the HTTP Header component,
a key? i.e., is each HTTP Header component in {http headers} uniquely
identified by it's {name}? 

This is implied by 6.5.6 IRI Identification Of An HTTP Header component
which uses the {name} in the frag id, so it had better be unique. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 19:10:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:05 UTC