W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > July 2006

{rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:26:33 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E803470895@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
AIUI, this fulfills AIs assigned variously to me and John Kaputin.


Section 4.1.1 of the Adjuncts specifies {rpc signature} as a required
property.  Per our recent clarifications, this will appear in the
component model whenever the implementation supports the rpc extension.
Thus, even if the {style} property does not include the rpc-style uri,
the {rpc signature} property will appear.  No default value is supplied


Instead, I believe it would be cleaner to make the {rpc property}
optional, and state that when the rpc style is engaged, the property
MUST appear.





 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com
<mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   ][  http://auburnmarshes.spaces.msn.com

Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 18:29:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:31:05 UTC