- From: Cindy McNally <cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:50:39 +0000
- To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Hi, I believe a clarification is waranted within part 1: core language re: interface inheritance. The following sentence appears to imply that an interface inherits faults and operations from interfaces defined within the extends attribute AND from interfaces extended indirectly, i.e. interfaces defined within the extends attribute of extended interfaces, etc ... "To avoid circular definitions, an interface MUST NOT appear as an element of the set of interfaces it extends, either directly or indirectly." The next sentence, however, seems to imply that an interface inherits content only from the interfaces listed within its extends attribute: "The set of operations available in an interface includes all the operations defined by the interfaces it extends, along with any operations it directly defines. " If the first supposition is correct, then what is the use case for being able to list more than one extended interface within the extends attribute? Please advise. Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ WIN up to $10,000 in cash or prizes – enter the Microsoft Office Live Sweepstakes http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0050001581mrt/direct/01/
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 15:16:37 UTC