- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:41:03 -0400
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: kendall@monkeyfist.com, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:56:15PM -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this > as a Last Call comment LC337 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the > problem in the following manner: > > - Copy the content of section 2.2 of the Describing Media Types for > Binary Content note (a product of this WG) into part two, > > - point the definition of whttp:inputSerialization, > whttp:outputSerialization, and whttp:faultSerialization at that > definition, > > - check other references to these serialization properties to insure > that they do not improperly restrict serialization to a single mime > type. > > The net effect is that you will be able to specify alternative media > types in the whttp:*serialization attributes. > > If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this > satisfies your concern. I believe this satisfies the concerns of DAWG which I raised on its behalf. Thanks, Jonathan. Cheers, Kendall -- Sad songs and waltzes aren't selling this year... --Cake
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 13:43:15 UTC