Tuesday, 28 June 2005
- RE: Editorial last call review comments
- RE: [LC9] Last Call issue: How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement (Part 1, section 2.2.1.1) relate to interface inheritance?
Saturday, 25 June 2005
Friday, 17 June 2005
Thursday, 16 June 2005
- RE: Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension"
- RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification
Tuesday, 14 June 2005
Friday, 10 June 2005
Thursday, 9 June 2005
- RE: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only
- LC84a/b resolutions
- RE: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug
- RE: default interface/operation/@pattern
- RE: Comments
- RE: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding
- RE: NEW ISSUE - message level binding?
- RE: In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"]
- RE: Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault="qualified" prevents restriction
- RE: binding fault defaulting?
- RE: WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies
- RE: WSDL 2.0 LC Comments
- RE: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial)