- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:36:15 -0800
- To: "Zvi Bruckner" <zvi.b@sapiens.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 19:36:43 UTC
The meaning of multiple inputs or outputs is defined by the Message Exchange Pattern in use. None of the MEPs in the Part 2 make use of multiple inputs or outputs. In effect, the schema allows them as an extensibility point. However, it might be a problem that only the primer says infault and outfault define alternative fault messages. That should probably be fixed (or clarified if I just missed it) in Part 1 or Part 2. ________________________________ From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Zvi Bruckner Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:39 AM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: Multiple input and output elements for an operation The WSDL schema allowa multiple input, output, infault and outfault within an operation. The primer says that multiple infault and outfault define alternative fault message. It does not define the role of of multiple input/output. Are they also regraded as alternative? Regards, Zvi Bruckner.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 19:36:43 UTC