- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:34:26 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
For the record, the Working Group agreed to address this problem by adopting the solution you outlined in [1]. We will assume you agree with this resolution if we don't hear from you by Oct 21st. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Sep/0049.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC45 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 2:13 PM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Part 3 section 3.6.2: {http location} not necessarily a template > > Section 3.6.2 of Part 3 says: > > {http location}, a wsdls:anyURI. The value of this property > specifies a template for the relative portion of the request URI for > an operation. This URI is combined with the base URI specified in > the {address} property of the endpoint element to form the full URI > for the HTTP request to invoke the operation. > > Actually, this is a template only for the > application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization, and is defined as > such in section 3.8.1. It isn't a template for other serializations we > define. > > I suggest dropping the following sentence: > > The value of this property specifies a template for the relative > portion of the request URI for an operation. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:34:40 UTC