- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 05:12:02 -0700
- To: "'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'" <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Christopher St. John" <cks@webmethods.com>
I am writing this issue on behalf of Christopher St. John, webMethods. ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#component_model http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x177 "This document does not specify a means of producing an XML Infoset representation from a given set of WSDL components. Furthermore, given a particular serialization, not all valid sets of components need be serializable to it. For instance, due to the use in the component model of types that cannot be described using XML schema (.e.g wsdls:string), it is possible to come up with a valid set of WSDL components that cannot be serialized as an XML 1.0 document." Last two sentences (above) sound very serious. I understand the issue and reasoning behind it. But, this paragraph does not provide sufficient information to first time readers. I request the editors to elaborate on why components cannot be serialized as an XML 1.0 doc and provide a link to the section that describes wsdl simple types. Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu asirv at webmethods dot com http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 12:12:39 UTC