- From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:28:58 +0000
- To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- CC: 'Charlton Barreto' <charlton_b@mac.com>, 'Steve Ross-Talbot' <steve@pi4tech.com>, 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <45EFF37A.8040303@pi4tech.com>
Hi Thats fine, so we just need to add it to the next agenda. Regards Gary Martin Chapman wrote: > Gary, > > Since the group depecided to accept the resolution of 3588 we will need a motion to reverse that decision. > > Martin. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown >> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:09 PM >> To: Martin Chapman >> Cc: 'Charlton Barreto'; 'Steve Ross-Talbot'; 'WS-Choreography List' >> Subject: Re: CR Issues Summary >> >> >> Hi >> >> All "Resolved Fixed" issues have been updated, including the ambiguous >> causeException on record elements issue, which has not been >> recorded in >> bugzilla, although the resolution was agreed on the last conf call. >> >> The only bugzilla issue not updated was 3588, which relates to >> passing a >> channel by its reference. At the time I did not believe this >> was a valid >> way to pass a channel - however since then we have actually >> created such >> an example in the list of Exit Examples and it has been >> implemented. So >> I now believe this example is valid, so feel the bugzilla issue should >> be closed won't fix. >> >> These examples illustrate the creation of a new channel based on the >> initial reference, which I now think is ok, as long as further passing >> of the created channel is by passing the channel itself. We >> may need to >> discuss this issue at the next conf call to confirm that the issue >> should be closed without applying the change. >> >> Regards >> Gary >> >> >> Martin Chapman wrote: >> >>> A full list of all Impl/CR issues are at: >>> >>> >>> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_ >> >> desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS+Choreography&component >> >> =Implementation%2FCR+Issue&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bu >> >> g_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=al >> >> lwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&email >> >> type1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include >> >> &bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit& >> >> order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&valu >> >>> e0-0-0= >>> >>> The 12 "Resolved Fixed" ones need to be edited into the >>> >> spec and when >> >>> we have approved that version they can be marked as closed: >>> >>> >>> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_ >> >> desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS+Choreography&component >> >> =Implementation%2FCR+Issue&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bu >> >> g_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=al >> >> lwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resol >> >> ution=FIXED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=& >> >> bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldval >> >> ue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&ty >> >>> pe0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= >>> >>> Hope this helps. >>> >>> Martin. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >>>> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:40 PM >>>> To: Charlton Barreto >>>> Cc: Steve Ross-Talbot; WS-Choreography List >>>> Subject: Re: No call tonight >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Charlton >>>> >>>> I am hoping that Martin should be able to send a bugzilla >>>> summary of all >>>> the issues that have a resolution but are still awaiting to >>>> >> be applied >> >>>> to the spec. >>>> >>>> This will also make it easier to work through the changes quickly. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> Charlton Barreto wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Steve, >>>>> >>>>> Yves would have the golden copy of the spec, and I the exit >>>>> examples. >>>>> >>>>> If the changes to applied could be listed/summarised, it would be >>>>> useful for framing their discussion at next week's telcon. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> -Charlton. >>>>> -- >>>>> charlton_b@mac.com >>>>> +1.650.222.6507 m >>>>> +1.415.692.5396 v >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, March 06, 2007, at 04:56PM, "Steve Ross-Talbot" >>>>> <steve@pi4tech.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Gentlepeople, >>>>>> >>>>>> no call tonight. Can either Yves or Charlton confirm who has the >>>>>> golden copy. Gary and/or I shall apply the changes. Then we >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> can have >>>> >>>> >>>>>> something concrete to do next call. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve T >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 11:29:32 UTC