- From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:08:53 +0000
- To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- CC: 'Charlton Barreto' <charlton_b@mac.com>, 'Steve Ross-Talbot' <steve@pi4tech.com>, 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <45EEF1A5.8080108@pi4tech.com>
Hi All "Resolved Fixed" issues have been updated, including the ambiguous causeException on record elements issue, which has not been recorded in bugzilla, although the resolution was agreed on the last conf call. The only bugzilla issue not updated was 3588, which relates to passing a channel by its reference. At the time I did not believe this was a valid way to pass a channel - however since then we have actually created such an example in the list of Exit Examples and it has been implemented. So I now believe this example is valid, so feel the bugzilla issue should be closed won't fix. These examples illustrate the creation of a new channel based on the initial reference, which I now think is ok, as long as further passing of the created channel is by passing the channel itself. We may need to discuss this issue at the next conf call to confirm that the issue should be closed without applying the change. Regards Gary Martin Chapman wrote: > A full list of all Impl/CR issues are at: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS+Choreography&component=Implementation%2FCR+Issue&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= > > The 12 "Resolved Fixed" ones need to be edited into the spec and when we have approved that version they can be marked as closed: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS+Choreography&component=Implementation%2FCR+Issue&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=FIXED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= > > Hope this helps. > > Martin. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown >> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:40 PM >> To: Charlton Barreto >> Cc: Steve Ross-Talbot; WS-Choreography List >> Subject: Re: No call tonight >> >> >> Hi Charlton >> >> I am hoping that Martin should be able to send a bugzilla >> summary of all >> the issues that have a resolution but are still awaiting to be applied >> to the spec. >> >> This will also make it easier to work through the changes quickly. >> >> Regards >> Gary >> >> >> Charlton Barreto wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> Yves would have the golden copy of the spec, and I the exit examples. >>> >>> If the changes to applied could be listed/summarised, it would be >>> useful for framing their discussion at next week's telcon. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Charlton. >>> -- >>> charlton_b@mac.com >>> +1.650.222.6507 m >>> +1.415.692.5396 v >>> >>> On Tuesday, March 06, 2007, at 04:56PM, "Steve Ross-Talbot" >>> <steve@pi4tech.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Gentlepeople, >>>> >>>> no call tonight. Can either Yves or Charlton confirm who has the >>>> golden copy. Gary and/or I shall apply the changes. Then we >>>> >> can have >> >>>> something concrete to do next call. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Steve T >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 17:10:56 UTC