- From: Kohei Honda <kohei@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:31:24 +0000
- To: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- CC: Kohei Honda <kohei@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>, "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
A bit confused with negation: > > From this viewpoint, my question is: are there any these > "request-reply" and its variants, including > notifications, which cannot be captured as a pattern of interaction, > which can be made explicit by the > use of co-relation identity? I meant, in the last clause: ..., which cannot be made explicit by the use of co-relation identity? My question was, therefore: whether all can be captured by co-relation (or session) identities or not. As written, even if all can, I do not oppose having explicit constructs for specifying local (or micro) protocols. kohei
Received on Monday, 30 October 2006 16:31:52 UTC