- From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:17:43 +0100
- To: 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Hi Currently the 'exchange' within an 'interaction' can have an action attribute with the values: "Within the |exchange| element, the attribute |action| specifies the direction of the information exchanged in the interaction: * When the |action| attribute is set to "request", then the information exchange happens from the 'from' roleType to the 'to' roleType * When the |action| attribute is set to "respond", then the information exchange happens from the 'to' roleType to the 'from' roleType" Where a request and response exchange are separated into different interactions, to enable intervening activities to be described, it requires the implementation to correlate the response exchange with the request exchange to determine they are part of a request-response MEP. Although in most situations, the use of operation names should support the correlation of the responses with appropriate requests, there may be some situations where a response exchange that actually represents a notification may be incorrectly associated with a preceding request. This is because the action type for a notification exchange would also be 'respond'. Therefore, although the chance of a notification exchange having the same operation name as a preceding request is remote, it is not forbidden, and therefore for clarity it would be useful to add a third exchange action type called "notify". This would enable better static validation as it will now be clear what each exchange represents. For example, if an exchange is defined as a 'respond' but no request precedes it, then this can be flagged as an error. Currently the assumption would be that it is a notification, and this would be silently ignored. If the change is acceptable, then the following updates are required in section 6.2.3: 1) Modify second bullet point above: From: * When the |action| attribute is set to "respond", then the information exchange happens from the 'to' roleType to the 'from' roleType" To: * When the |action| attribute is set to "respond", then the information exchange happens from the 'to' roleType to the 'from' roleType" and the exchange MUST be associated directly or indirectly with a preceding exchange of action type "request" for the same operation and channel 2) Additional bullet point on text above: * When the |action| attribute is set to "notify", then the information exchange happens from the 'to' roleType to the 'from' roleType" 3) Following the para that starts "The OPTIONAL record element....." From: "When the |action| element is set to "response", then the recordings specified within the |source| and the |target| elements MUST occur at the 'to' roleType for the send and at the 'from' roleType for the receive" To: "When the |action| element is set to "respond" or "notify", then the recordings specified within the |source| and the |target| elements MUST occur at the 'to' roleType for the send and at the 'from' roleType for the receive" Regards Gary
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 13:18:01 UTC