- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:19:00 -0800
- To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>
- Cc: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica, > I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the > new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the > semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit > something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up. > > Cheers > Steve T We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is not tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by allowing a respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary said there is no other difference. Thanks.
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:19:13 UTC